Focus: Fire-Life Safety / Column

Regulations, Codes & Standards Q&A: Strobe synchronization

By Brad Keyes / Special to Healthcare Facilities Today
April 3, 2019

Q: My fire alarm installer tells me that NFPA 72 does not require strobe synchronization of two (only two) devices. the sync is required if there are more than two. I read NFPA 72 2010 18.4.3.2 (4) and it is not clear if he is correct. Can you comment on it, please?

A: The installer is technically correct in that, since 1996, all manufacturers’ strobe flash rates were lowered so that viewing two non-synched devices would not produce an overall flash rate considered to be dangerous.  As far as code requirements, the NFPA requirement for strobe synchronization is actually found in Chapter 18.5.4.3.2 (for rooms) and 18.5.4.4.5 & 7 (corridors).  If this question is being asked for a room, then the intent is to achieve a minimum light output.  If achieving that output requires ‘…more than 2 visual appliances…’, then they must be synched.  In a corridor, “when more than 2 visible notification devices are in any field of view, they shall flash in synchronization.”  So technically, if just two strobes are in the overall field of view (including non-direct viewing), they don’t need to be synched to meet NFPA 72 requirements.

That’s in a vacuum.  However, in the real world, these devices are generally on circuits that have additional visual devices that serve other areas where more than two devices are in the direct or non-direct field of view, or the circuit may need be expanded in the future where synchronization is required.  Another important real world consideration is the expectation of the facility’s reviewing AHJ (CMS, State Agency, Joint Commission, etc.).  Unless the strobes were installed prior to 1999, the expectation of every AHJ I’ve dealt with since that time is that every strobe in line of sight will be synched.  If in response to a citation, the chief engineer of a healthcare facility wants to pull out the code book and cite specific code application of strobe synchronization to their reviewer, he may eventually win that battle (or not), but in doing so he may be opening the door to a more ‘letter of the code’ enforcement regarding other areas of concern.

NOTE: Gene Rowe from Affiliated Fire Systems provided the answer to this question.

Brad Keyes, CHSP, is the owner of KEYES Life Safety Compliance, and his expertise is in the management of the Life Safety Program, including the Environment of Care and Emergency Management programs.

See the latest posts on our homepage


Share

Topic Area: Regulations, Codes & Standards


Recent Posts
Recent Posts

South Carolina hospitals reviewing security after two shootings


South Carolina Hospital Association hosted a webinar about violence in healthcare settings

4/25/2019

Integrating modern equipment into existing spaces


The size of the new equipment, the need to reconfigured floor plans and existing building constraints must be considered

4/25/2019

Study finds low hand-hygiene compliance in ICUs


Hand-hygiene compliance was lowest when moving from dirtier to cleaner patient-care tasks

4/25/2019

Tennessee hospital boost security following shooting


The Regional Medical Center in Orangeburg is adding armed guards

4/25/2019

Focus: Energy Efficiency

HVAC, lighting upgrades help facility save money


Changes support user needs and cut energy costs

4/25/2019





Post Comment




FREE
NEWSLETTER

News & Updates • Webcast Alerts • Building Technologies

All fields are required.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.