Focus: Fire-Life Safety / Column

Regulations, Codes & Standards Q&A: Strobe synchronization

By Brad Keyes / Special to Healthcare Facilities Today
April 3, 2019

Q: My fire alarm installer tells me that NFPA 72 does not require strobe synchronization of two (only two) devices. the sync is required if there are more than two. I read NFPA 72 2010 18.4.3.2 (4) and it is not clear if he is correct. Can you comment on it, please?

A: The installer is technically correct in that, since 1996, all manufacturers’ strobe flash rates were lowered so that viewing two non-synched devices would not produce an overall flash rate considered to be dangerous.  As far as code requirements, the NFPA requirement for strobe synchronization is actually found in Chapter 18.5.4.3.2 (for rooms) and 18.5.4.4.5 & 7 (corridors).  If this question is being asked for a room, then the intent is to achieve a minimum light output.  If achieving that output requires ‘…more than 2 visual appliances…’, then they must be synched.  In a corridor, “when more than 2 visible notification devices are in any field of view, they shall flash in synchronization.”  So technically, if just two strobes are in the overall field of view (including non-direct viewing), they don’t need to be synched to meet NFPA 72 requirements.

That’s in a vacuum.  However, in the real world, these devices are generally on circuits that have additional visual devices that serve other areas where more than two devices are in the direct or non-direct field of view, or the circuit may need be expanded in the future where synchronization is required.  Another important real world consideration is the expectation of the facility’s reviewing AHJ (CMS, State Agency, Joint Commission, etc.).  Unless the strobes were installed prior to 1999, the expectation of every AHJ I’ve dealt with since that time is that every strobe in line of sight will be synched.  If in response to a citation, the chief engineer of a healthcare facility wants to pull out the code book and cite specific code application of strobe synchronization to their reviewer, he may eventually win that battle (or not), but in doing so he may be opening the door to a more ‘letter of the code’ enforcement regarding other areas of concern.

NOTE: Gene Rowe from Affiliated Fire Systems provided the answer to this question.

Brad Keyes, CHSP, is the owner of KEYES Life Safety Compliance, and his expertise is in the management of the Life Safety Program, including the Environment of Care and Emergency Management programs.

See the latest posts on our homepage


Share

Topic Area: Regulations, Codes & Standards


Recent Posts
Recent Posts

Australian hospital may be vulnerable in disaster


Outdated policies and unclear roles cited

6/25/2019

Focus: Environmental Services

Heroes of Infection Prevention Award winners announced


Award honors infection preventionists who have helped to reduce infection, raise awareness, and improve the health and well-being of patients, healthcare workers, and the public

6/25/2019

Guards at Chinese psychiatric hospital fired after escape of four patients


Group got through main exit by posing as visitors taking their relatives out for a break

6/25/2019

Focus: Renovation

Boston hospital expansion to include disaster, flood protection


The design will consider every worst-case scenario

6/25/2019

IDEC Introduces Safety Interlock Switch


6/25/2019





Post Comment




FREE
NEWSLETTER

News & Updates • Webcast Alerts • Building Technologies

All fields are required.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.