A recent review of published information on automated hand-hygiene systems found little hard evidence of their effectiveness, according to an article on the American Journal of Infection Control website.
University of Iowa researchers found that electronically assisted/enhanced direct observation, video-monitored direct observation systems, electronic dispenser counters and automated hand- hygiene monitoring networks tended to be used, but less than 20 percent of the articles included calculations for efficiency or accuracy.
According to the article, information on the cost-effectiveness of these systems will be needed before they are widely adopted.
The Future of the Global Hospital Hygiene Market
Rethinking Fire Safety Inspections
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Officially Opens
Healthcare and Resilience: A Pledge for Change
Texas Health Resources Announces New Hospital for North McKinney