A recent review of published information on automated hand-hygiene systems found little hard evidence of their effectiveness, according to an article on the American Journal of Infection Control website.
University of Iowa researchers found that electronically assisted/enhanced direct observation, video-monitored direct observation systems, electronic dispenser counters and automated hand- hygiene monitoring networks tended to be used, but less than 20 percent of the articles included calculations for efficiency or accuracy.
According to the article, information on the cost-effectiveness of these systems will be needed before they are widely adopted.
Making the Energy Efficiency Case to the C-Suite
How to Avoid HAIs This Flu Season
Design Phase Set to Begin for Hospital Annex at SUNY Upstate Medical
Building Hospital Resilience in an Era of Extreme Weather
Ennoble Care Falls Victim to Data Breach