A recent review of published information on automated hand-hygiene systems found little hard evidence of their effectiveness, according to an article on the American Journal of Infection Control website.
University of Iowa researchers found that electronically assisted/enhanced direct observation, video-monitored direct observation systems, electronic dispenser counters and automated hand- hygiene monitoring networks tended to be used, but less than 20 percent of the articles included calculations for efficiency or accuracy.
According to the article, information on the cost-effectiveness of these systems will be needed before they are widely adopted.
Disinfectant Contact Time: The Case for Biofilm Disruption
Rethinking How Healthcare Facilities Fund Construction Projects
Putting Trauma-Informed Design into Practice
Harris Health to Build New Freestanding Cancer Center
Inland Empire Health Plan Opens Expanded San Bernardino Community Wellness Center