A recent review of published information on automated hand-hygiene systems found little hard evidence of their effectiveness, according to an article on the American Journal of Infection Control website.
University of Iowa researchers found that electronically assisted/enhanced direct observation, video-monitored direct observation systems, electronic dispenser counters and automated hand- hygiene monitoring networks tended to be used, but less than 20 percent of the articles included calculations for efficiency or accuracy.
According to the article, information on the cost-effectiveness of these systems will be needed before they are widely adopted.
Making AI Work for Predictive Maintenance
Thomas Jefferson University Unveils Plans for Sidney Kimmel Medical College in Allentown, PA
Aspirus Chippewa Falls Hospital and Clinic to Open in September
Respecting EVS Workers: 19 Minutes Is Not Enough
Where are the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hotspots in Healthcare?