A recent review of published information on automated hand-hygiene systems found little hard evidence of their effectiveness, according to an article on the American Journal of Infection Control website.
University of Iowa researchers found that electronically assisted/enhanced direct observation, video-monitored direct observation systems, electronic dispenser counters and automated hand- hygiene monitoring networks tended to be used, but less than 20 percent of the articles included calculations for efficiency or accuracy.
According to the article, information on the cost-effectiveness of these systems will be needed before they are widely adopted.
Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease on the Rise
BayCare Reveals Pagidipati Children's Hospital at St. Joseph's
Preparing for the Hazards of Winter Weather
Why Identity Governance Is Becoming a Facilities Management Issue
Habitat Health Opens South Los Angeles PACE Center