NFPA, OSHA work to reduce confusion over hazard labeling

Hazardous materials labeling guidelines recently adopted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have the potential to cause confusion and expose individuals to harm through misunderstanding of hazard levels, according to NFPA.

By Healthcare Facilities Today


Hazardous materials labeling guidelines recently adopted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have the potential to cause confusion and expose individuals to harm through misunderstanding of hazard levels, according to an article in NFPA Journal. Both organizations are working to educate and inform their constituencies on the situation in order to mitigate the potential risk.

Last year, OSHA updated its Hazard Communication Standard (HCS or HazCom2012) to include the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). GHS stems from a United Nations effort to standardize hazardous materials labeling worldwide.

NFPA also provides guidance on how to label hazardous materials, through NFPA 704, Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency Response. It is a widely adopted labeling standard with the iconic "square on point" label calling out health, flammability and reactive stability hazards in blue, red and yellow squares with a number indicating the level of hazard.

NFPA 704 is commonly used by employers to comply with the HCS requirement for employee education, says the article. The problem comes in that GHS uses a numbering strategy for hazard levels that's inverted from the NFPA strategy: the most severe rating in the GHS is 1, while in NFPA's it's 4. In addition, the NFPA scale goes from 1 to 4, where the GHS scale goes from 0 to 4, meaning that the same chemical could land in slightly different hazard categories.

At this point, there are no plans to revise NFPA 704 to match the GHS category numbering.  NFPA 704 ratings can still be included in safety data sheets and can still be a part of hazard communication. OSHA and NFPA are working on reference cards available on their websites which will detail HazCom2012 with GHS and NFPA 704 elements side-by-side, according to the article.

Read the article.



May 30, 2013


Topic Area: Safety


Recent Posts

Cleanliness in Hospitals: Clinical Priority and Community Perception

EVS managers and communities value cleanliness for complementary reasons: managers for safety and compliance, communities for trust and comfort.


Dana-Farber Receives $50M Gift for Planned Cancer Hospital

A $50 million grant from the Yawkey Foundation will support construction of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute’s planned 450,000-square-foot cancer hospital.


Clarinda Regional Health Center Reports Data Security Incident

On or around December 15, 2025, Clarinda learned that certain data within its network may have been accessed without authorization.


Gaps in Nurses' Environmental Cleaning Knowledge Grow Amid Rising EVS Pressures

Environmental cleaning is crucial in preventing HAIs, but when the responsibility falls to those outside of EVS teams, problems arise. 


Ground Broken on the Southern Nevada Forensic Facility

Construction on the new secure forensic psychiatric hospital is expected to be completed in 2029.


 
 


FREE Newsletter Signup Form

News & Updates | Webcast Alerts
Building Technologies | & More!

 
 
 


All fields are required. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.