By HFT Staff

Key Takeaways:

• Healthcare organizations expanding into ambulatory care should reassess hospital-centered facilities management practices to address differences in compliance requirements, staffing needs and operational risks across outpatient sites.
• Centralizing compliance standards, facilities technology and service models can improve portfolio-wide visibility while allowing staffing and maintenance strategies to adapt to each facility’s needs and local risks.
• Energy assessments, facility condition assessments and portfolio reviews can help healthcare systems identify cost savings, prioritize deferred maintenance and fund longer-term improvements without placing additional strain on tight operating budgets.

Imaging centers, infusion suites, urgent care clinics and surgery centers are appearing in neighborhoods nationwide, driven by factors that include an aging population, rising outpatient demand and the push to put care closer to home. As a result, these facilities are reshaping healthcare’s real estate footprint, but what happens when a facility management system built to run acute care hospitals is asked to run an array of ambulatory care facilities instead? 

The acute-care playbook breakdown 

Most of the operating problems with such a transition arise from a simple mismatch: America’s facilities management playbooks were written for acute care facilities with medical gas systems, overnight staffing and life-safety protocols built for patients who cannot leave. Organizations apply this approach onto ambulatory sites rather than rebuild the strategy, even though ambulatory sites carry a different risk profile. 

Run that mismatch long enough, and the following cracks emerge. These warning signs indicate that an operating model needs to change: 

Reactive firefighting. Without a maintenance regime built for ambulatory sites, technicians jump from one urgent issue to the next instead of getting ahead of them, which usually results in more costly repairs and a higher time investment for staff. 

Rising survey deficiencies. Ambulatory-specific standards fall through the cracks of a hospital-oriented compliance program. Left unaddressed, these deficiencies can turn into a partial site shutdown: no patients, no revenue. 

Blind spots on outlying sites. Some buildings sit geographically or operationally out of the facilities management team’s sight. That is how small issues quietly turn into big ones, such as life-safety gaps and equipment failures that can disrupt care and erase already-thin margins overnight. 

Uncertainty on root cause. Leadership is not sure whether the issue is structure, process, technology or talent, which tend to be the reasons a system finally calls in outside help. 

Individually, each of these warning signs feels like a normal day. Together, they have the financial and operational impact to indicate a portfolio that has outgrown its operating model. 

HFT Recommends: Optimizing the Engineering Design of Ambulatory Care Facilities

The playbook that actually works 

The good news is that a more effective approach already is taking shape across the industry. Healthcare organizations that are thriving have learned how to centralize the standards, then let execution flex locally site by site. 

One West Coast health system hired a dedicated, centralized compliance lead and is rewriting its ambulatory standards from scratch on the premise that acute and ambulatory settings each call for their own dedicated rules that are written for the way each unique setting runs. A handful of systems in the Northeast have made a parallel move on the technology side, consolidating onto one centralized platform so leadership can get a complete view of portfolio-wide building data instead of piecing it together site by site. 

The same logic extends to staffing. For some systems, centralizing has meant more defined and tiered service models based on facility type. For example, a flagship surgery center requires a different staffing level than a single-provider clinic down the road. This strategy is also how geographic risk comes under control. A hurricane-prone site and an earthquake-prone site can share the same emergency-preparedness playbook instead of numerous local teams writing their own playbooks. 

None of this transition happens without visibility, which is the reason consolidating fragmented facilities technology into one platform tends to be where the work begins, alongside a current-state assessment, stakeholder interviews to expose the real pain points and a roadmap that sequences quick wins alongside bigger structural changes. 

Some of these changes — such as energy assessments that free up cash within months and spotting overlapping sites from past mergers and acquisitions that can be consolidated — can happen quickly, even if the execution of a consolidation can take time. A full facility condition assessment and capital plan takes longer and pays off just as directly. 

Thin margins make funding a fair question before any of this starts, and with the right strategic partner, much of it can pay for itself. Energy-as-a-service covers the upfront cost of upgrading lighting, HVAC and controls. Then it repays itself out of the savings those upgrades generate. A facility condition assessment often reveals a second source. Once a system identifies urgent repairs, deferred maintenance dollars open up and redirect to where they are needed most. The early wins fund the next phase, and the cycle continues. 

Healthcare's real estate transformation has outpaced its facilities operating models. A consolidated approach can lower operational risk, support smarter decision making and bring more patients the care they need closer to home. Every dollar freed from chasing the next emergency is a dollar available for the next site, the next service line or the next community with greater access to care. 

Welcome to the new standard for accessible, well-run healthcare. 

Carey Sealy is managing director with JLL. He leads two practices across the Work Dynamics Healthcare division: Ambulatory & Outpatient and ATG, which aim to help health systems and large organizations operate smarter across their real estate and facilities portfolios. 

Editor's note: This is part two of a two-part series. Click here to read part one.